BARRACK BARRY OBAMA SOETORO Birth Certificate FRAUD

Technorati Tags:

Obama’s Classmate at Columbia

On August 16, 2012, in Uncategorized, by admin

I am President Obama’s classmate at Columbia University, Class of ’83. I am also one of the most accurate Las Vegas oddsmakers and prognosticators. Accurate enough that I was awarded my own star on the Las Vegas Walk of Stars. And I smell something rotten in Denmark. Obama has a big skeleton in his closet. It’s his college records. Call it “gut instinct” but my gut is almost always right. Obama has a secret hidden at Columbia- and it’s a bad one that threatens to bring down his presidency. Gut instinct is how I’ve made my living for 29 years since graduating Columbia.
Obama and his infamous strategist David Axelrod understand how to play political hardball, the best it’s ever been played. Team Obama has decided to distract America’s voters by condemning Mitt Romney for not releasing enough years of his tax returns. It’s the perfect cover. Obama knows the best defense is a bold offense. Just keep attacking Mitt and blaming him for secrecy and evasion, while accusing him of having a scandal that doesn’t exist. Then ask followers like Senator Harry Reid to chase the lead. The U.S. Senate Majority Leader appears to now be making up stories out of thin air, about tax returns he knows nothing about. It’s a cynical, brilliant, and vicious strategy. Make Romney defend, so he can’t attack the real Obama scandal.
This is classic Axelrod. Obama has won several elections in his career by slandering his opponents and leaking sealed documents. Not only do these insinuations and leaks ruin the credibility and reputation of Obama’s opponents, they keep them on the defensive and off Obama’s trail of sealed documents.
By attacking Romney’s tax records, Obama’s socialist cabal creates a problem that doesn’t exist. Is the U.S. Senate Majority Leader making up stories out of thin air? You decide. But the reason for this baseless attack is clear- make Romney defend, so not only is he “off message” but it helps the media ignore the real Obama scandal.
My answer for Romney? Call Obama’s bluff.
Romney should call a press conference and issue a challenge in front of the nation. He should agree to release more of his tax returns, only if Obama unseals his college records. Simple and straight-forward. Mitt should ask “What could possibly be so embarrassing in your college records from 29 years ago that you are afraid to let America’s voters see? If it’s THAT bad, maybe it’s something the voters ought to see.” Suddenly the tables are turned. Now Obama is on the defensive.
My bet is that Obama will never unseal his records because they contain information that could destroy his chances for re-election. Once this challenge is made public, my prediction is you’ll never hear about Mitt’s tax returns ever again.
Why are the college records, of a 51-year-old President of the United States, so important to keep secret? I think I know the answer.
If anyone should have questions about Obama’s record at Columbia University, it’s me. We both graduated (according to Obama) Columbia University, Class of ’83. We were both (according to Obama) Pre-Law and Political Science majors. And I thought I knew most everyone at Columbia. I certainly thought I’d heard of all of my fellow Political Science majors. But not Obama (or as he was known then- Barry Soetoro). I never met him. Never saw him. Never even heard of him. And none of the classmates that I knew at Columbia have ever met him, saw him, or heard of him.
But don’t take my word for it. The Wall Street Journal reported in 2008 that Fox News randomly called 400 of our Columbia classmates and never found one who had ever met Obama.
Now all of this mystery could be easily and instantly dismissed if Obama released his Columbia transcripts to the media. But even after serving as President for 3 1/2 years he refuses to unseal his college records. Shouldn’t the media be as relentless in pursuit of Obama’s records as Romney’s? Shouldn’t they be digging into Obama’s past–beyond what he has written about himself–with the same boundless enthusiasm as Mitt’s?
The first question I’d ask is, if you had great grades, why would you seal your records? So let’s assume Obama got poor grades. Why not release the records? He’s president of the free world, for gosh sakes. He’s commander-in-chief of the U.S. military. Who’d care about some poor grades from three decades ago, right? So then what’s the problem? Doesn’t that make the media suspicious? Something doesn’t add up.
Secondly, if he had poor grades at Occidental, how did he get admitted to an Ivy League university in the first place? And if his grades at Columbia were awful, how’d he ever get into Harvard Law School? So again those grades must have been great, right? So why spend millions to keep them sealed?
Third, how did Obama pay for all these fancy schools without coming from a wealthy background? If he had student loans or scholarships, would he not have to maintain good grades?
I can only think of one answer that would explain this mystery.
Here’s my gut belief: Obama got a leg up by being admitted to both Occidental and Columbia as a foreign exchange student. He was raised as a young boy in Indonesia. But did his mother ever change him back to a U.S. citizen? When he returned to live with his grandparents in Hawaii or as he neared college-age preparing to apply to schools, did he ever change his citizenship back? I’m betting not.
If you could unseal Obama’s Columbia University records I believe you’d find that:
A) He rarely ever attended class.
B) His grades were not those typical of what we understand it takes to get into Harvard Law School.
C) He attended Columbia as a foreign exchange student.
D) He paid little for either undergraduate college or Harvard Law School because of foreign aid and scholarships given to a poor foreign students like this kid Barry Soetoro from Indonesia.
If you think I’m “fishing” then prove me wrong. Open up your records Mr. President. What are you afraid of?
If it’s okay for U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to go on a fishing expedition about Romney’s taxes (even though he knows absolutely nothing about them nor will release his own), then I think I can do the same thing. But as Obama’s Columbia Class of ’83 classmate, at least I have more standing to make educated guesses.
It’s time for Mitt to go on the attack and call Obama’s bluff.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Tagged with:
 

obama is a liar

On June 18, 2012, in Uncategorized, by admin

A wolf in sheep’s clothing…………
:For your reading enjoyment.
Subject:.
TERRY ANDERSON, A BLACK LOS ANGELES TALK RADIO HOST, WENT DOWN A LIST OF
THINGS SENATOR OBAMA HAS SAID THAT AREN’T EXACTLY CORRECT.
1.) Selma March Got Me Born – NOT EXACTLY, your parents felt safe enough to
have you in 1961 – Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965.
(Google ‘Obama Selma ‘ for his full March 4, 2007 speech and articles a bout
its various untruths.) ! !
2.) Father Was A Goat Herder – NOT EXACTLY, he was a privileged, well
educated youth, who went on to work with the Kenyan Government.
3.) Father Was A Proud Freedom Fighter – NOT EXACTLY, he was part of one of
the most corrupt and violent governments Kenya has ever had.
4.) My Family Has Strong Ties To African Freedom – NOT EXACTLY; your cousin
Raila Odinga has created mass violence in attempting to overturn a
legitimate election in 2007, in Kenya. It is the first widespread violence
in decades. The current government is pro-American but Odinga wants to
overthrow it and establish Muslim Sharia law. Your half-brother, Abongo Oba
ma, is Odinga’s follower. You interrupted your New Hampshire campaigning to
speak to Odinga on the phone. Check out the following link for verification
of that….and for more.
Obama’s cousin Odinga in Kenya ran for president and tried to get Sharia
Muslim law in place there. When Odinga lost the elections, his followers
have burned Christians’ homes and then burned men, women and children alive
in a Christian church where they took shelter… Obama SUPPORTED his cousin
before the election process here started. Google Obama and Odinga and see
what you get. No one wants to know the truth.
5.) My Grandmother Has Always Been A Christian – NOT EXACTLY, she does her
daily Salat prayers at 5am according to her own interviews. Not to mention,
Christianity wouldn’t allow her to have been one of 14 wives to1 man.
6.) My Name is African Swahili – NOT EXACTLY, your name is Arabic and
‘Baraka’ (from which Barack came) means ‘blessed’ in that language. Hussein
is also Arabic and so is Obama.
Barack Hussein Obama is not half black. If elected, he would be the first
Arab-American President, not the first black President. Barack Hussein Obama
is 50% Caucasian from his mother’s side and 43.75% Arabic and 6.25% African
Negro from his father’s side. While Barack Hussein Obama’s father was from
Kenya , his father’s family was mainly Arabs.. Barack Hussein Obama’s father
was only 12.5% African Negro and 87.5% Arab (his father’s birth certificate
even states he’s Arab, not African Negro). From….and for more….go
to…..

http://www.arcadeathome.com/newsboy.phtml?Barack_Hussein_Obama_-_Arab-Americ

an,_only_6.25%25_African
7.) I Never Practiced Islam – NOT EXACTLY, you practiced it daily at school,
where you were registered as a Muslim and kept that faith for 31 years,
until your wife made you change, so you could run for office.
4-3-08 Article ‘Obama was ‘quite religious in Islam”
#HYPERLINK “http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view”http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view
<#HYPERLINK "http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60559"http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60559> &pageId=60559
8.) My School In Indonesia Was Christian – NOT EXACTLY, you were registered
as Muslim there and got in trouble in Koranic Studies for making faces
(check your own book).
February 28, 2008. Kristoff from the New York Times a year ago: Mr. Obama
recalled the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer, reciting them with
a first-rate accent. In a remark that seemed delightfully uncalculated
(it’ll give Alabama voters heart attacks), Mr. Obama described the call to
prayer as ‘one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.’ This is just one
example of what Pamela is talking about when she says ‘Obama’s narrative is
being altered, enhanced and manipulated to whitewash troubling facts.’
9.) I Was Fluent In Indonesian – NOT EXACTLY, not one teacher says you could
speak the language.
10.) Because I Lived In Indonesia , I Have More Foreign Experience – NOT
EXACTLY, you were there from the ages of 6 to 10, and couldn’t even speak
the language. What did you learn except how to study the Koran and watch
cartoons?
11.) I Am Stronger On Foreign Affairs – NOT EXACTLY, except for Africa
(surprise) and the Middle East (bigger surprise); you have never been
anywhere else on the planet and thus have NO experience with our closest
allies.
12.) I Blame My Early Drug Use On Ethnic Confusion – NOT EXACTLY, you were
quite content in high school to be Barry Obama, no mention of Kenya and no
mention of struggle to identify – your classmates said you were just fine
13.)An Ebony Article Moved Me To Run For Office – NOT EXACTLY, Ebony has yet
to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn’t, and never did,
exist.
14.) A Life Magazine Article Changed My Outlook On Life – NOT EXACTLY, Life
has yet to find the article you mention in your book. It doesn’t, and never
did, exist.
15.) I Won’t Run On A National Ticket In ’08 – NOT EXACTLY, here you are,
despite saying, live on TV, which you would not have enough experience by
then, and you are all about having experience first.
16.) Voting ‘Present’ is Common In Illinois Senate – NOT EXACTLY, they are
common for YOU, but not many others have 130 NO VOTES.
17.) Oops, I Miss-voted – NOT EXACTLY, only when caught by church groups and
Democrats, did you beg to change your misvote.
18.) I Was A Professor Of Law – NOT EXACTLY; you were a senior lecturer ON
LEAVE.
19.) I Was A Constitutional Lawyer – NOT EXACTLY, you were a senior lecturer
ON LEAVE.
20.) Without Me, There Would Be No Ethics Bill – NOT EXACTLY, you didn’t
write it, introduce it, change it or create it.
21.) The Ethics Bill Was Hard To Pass – NOT EXACTLY, it took just 14 days
from start to finish.
22.) I Wrote A Tough Nuclear Bill – NOT EXACTLY, your bill was rejected by
your own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation – mainly because
of your Nuclear donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.
23.) I Have Released My State Records – NOT EXACTLY, as of March, 2008,
state bills you sponsored or voted for have yet to be released, exposing all
the special interests pork hidden within.
24.) I Took On The Asbestos Altgeld Gardens Mess – NOT EXACTLY, you were
part of a large group of people who remedied Altgeld Gardens. You failed to
mention anyone else but yourself, in your books.
25.) My Economics Bill Will Help America – NOT EXACTLY, your 111 economic
policies were just combined into a proposal which lost 99-0, and even YOU
voted against your own bill.
26.) I Have Been A Bold Leader In Illinois – NOT EXACTLY, even your own
supporters claim to have not seen BOLD action on your part.
27.) I Passed 26 Of My Own Bills In One Year – NOT EXACTLY, they were not
YOUR bills, but rather handed to you, after their creation by a fellow
Senator, to assist you in a future bid for higher office.
28.) No One on my campaign contacted Canada about NAFTA – NOT EXACTLY, the
Canadian Government issued the names and a memo of the conversation your
campaign had with them.
29.) I Am Tough On Terrorism – NOT EXACTLY, you missed the Iran Resolution
vote on terrorism and your good friend Ali Abunimah supports the destruction
off Israel.
30.) I Want All Votes To Count – NOT EXACTLY; you said let the delegates
decide.
31.) I Want Americans To Decide – NOT EXACTLY, you prefer caucuses that
limit the vote, confuse the voters, force a public vote, and only operate
during small windows of time.
32.) I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate – NOT EXACTLY, you passed 26,
most of which you didn’t write yourself.
33.) I Believe In Fairness, Not Tactics – NOT EXACTLY, you used tactics to
eliminate Alice Palmer from running against you.
34.) I Don’t Take PAC Money – NOT EXACTLY, you take loads of it.
35.) I don’t Have Lobbyists – NOT EXACTLY, you have over 47 lobbyists, and
counting.
36.) My Campaign Had Nothing To Do With The 1984 Ad – NOT EXACTLY, your own
campaign worker made the ad on his Apple in one afternoon.
37.) I Have Always Been Against Iraq – NOT EXACTLY, you weren’t in office to
vote against it AND you have voted to fund it every single time.
38.) I Have Always Supported Universal Health Care – NOT EXACTLY, your plan
leaves us all to pay for the 15,000,000 who don’t have to buy it.
39.) My uncle liberated Auschwitz concentration camp – NOT EXACTLY, your
mother had no brothers and the Russian army did the liberating.
So, who EXACTLY is this Obama guy and what is he trying to sell us?! Please
get to work now…not enough of your loved ones and friends know about this
fraud.
God Bless America

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Tagged with:
 

1991 Obama Journal

On May 17, 2012, in Uncategorized, by admin

Obama born where???

Obama born where???

OBAMA born in two different places on same day!

Technorati Tags: ,

Tagged with:
 

Obama gives up dog for Cloony boob

On May 17, 2012, in Uncategorized, by admin

Taste Better Than Dog

Technorati Tags:

Tagged with:
 

Obama is a LOSER

On May 1, 2012, in Uncategorized, by admin

Whether the standard to measure Barack Obama is legislative, fiscal, foreign policy, managerial or personal, Obama ranks among the lowest of the low in presidential ability.
Legislatively, Obama’s signature piece of legislation, Obamacare, is tied up in a Supreme Court challenge which has exposed the shameful short cuts, side dealings and horse-trading that Team Obama was forced to implement in order to have the legislation scrape past the Senate. Billions of dollars of “incentives” to Senators and congressmen can be done once or twice. But, if congress requires these kinds of tawdry incentives to advance Obama’s presidential agenda, it is hard to imagine Obama has any ability to implement future legislation.
Consider some of Obama’s other signature efforts–a JOBS bills that doesn’t create jobs, an energy policy that increases the price of gas at the pump and increases America’s dependence on foreign oil. An insistence of subsidies, for failed “green” endeavors, that waste billions of taxpayer dollars on ill-thought Solar and wind schemes that advance the agendas of Obama’s political allies.
Fiscally, Obama has been the most irresponsible president in the history of the United States (and that is saying something!). Obama’s spend, spend, spend agenda has kept the economy from growing, has created new generations of citizens dependent upon the government dole and has resulted in the slowest growth in GDP in three years. And for what? Obama has not been able to create the jobs he promised because Obama doesn’t understand that business, not government, creates jobs in a free economy.
Entitlement spending has ballooned to outrageous levels wherein over 50% of Americans do not work, nor do they look likely to do so in the future. Obama has put in place trillions of taxpayer dollars as spending intended to stimulate the economy. But the economy has not been “stimulated”, though the pockets of Obama’s political allies have been generously lined with taxpayer dollars.
The president has not even been able to produce a federal budget that can be debated seriously by congress. His last such pathetic attempt was unanimously voted down (0-414), showing that Obama has been abandoned by his own party. Could congress, in a bi-partisan effort, be sending the president an indisputable message about what they think of Obama’s stewardship of the economy?
What does it say that Obama can’t even get one vote on an issue as important as the federal budget? There seems to be universal, bi-partisan agreement that in matters financial, the president is irrelevant.
Obama’s international shenanigans, from his bowing and scraping his way across Asia during his first year in office, to his hugs and handshakes for charlatans and brutish dictators, has been a public embarrassment. Obama’s off-mike comments to Medvedev show the president to be an anxious schoolboy, lackey-like and eager to be all things to all people, desperate for praise and willing to sacrifice American values to achieve.
The story of George Washington and the cherry tree may be apocryphal; merely a tale emblematic of George Washington’s propensity for truthfulness, but Obama spawns no such legend. He has told too many falsehoods, taken too many short cuts, and appointed as his spokespersons and surrogates, too many who do the same, and hence, Obama has lost the trust of the American people. What Obama has lost is what Americans value most—integrity.
And then there is the personal. It is turning out that Obama is actually not very likeable. At every opportunity, Obama seems to jump into controversies that should be solved at a state or local level (Gates affair in Cambridge, MA or Trayvon Martin in FL), before he has all the facts. Obama is showing himself to be a race-baiter, citing directly, or through his surrogates, that any who disagree with his policies or opinions must somehow be racist. Or there’s the class-warfare mongering. Repeatedly, Americans hear Obama blaming “millionaires and billionaires”, claiming that they haven’t paid their “fair share”, though Obama is a multi-millionaire and he, too, takes advantage of every tax loophole.
Barack Obama has been so fixated on his re-election (another of his falsehoods since he has often stated he didn’t care if he was a one-term president) and consumed with building winning “issues-based” coalitions, that he has lost the trust and respect and confidence of most Americans. Even if Obama, by some sleight of hand, were to win in November, he has no mandate; he lost consumer confidence, and he can’t govern.
John Marshall once said that a statesmen is a “a person that loves the people enough to tell them the truth”. Barack Obama is clearly no statesmen and has repeatedly refused to deal honestly with the nation’s problems as he ceaselessly maneuvers for short term political gain. Even if he wins the election, it’ll be the longest lame duck session in the nation’s history. Barack Obama cannot govern. The nation is wiser and demands a statesman.
By Lorita Doun

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Tagged with:
 

Woof! Woof! Romney was mean to his dog?

On April 22, 2012, in Uncategorized, by admin

The theater of the absurd that is our presidential election keeps chugging along with all the vigor our economy doesn’t. One can’t blame Democrats for attempting distraction upon distraction, given the alternative of talking about President Obama’s record.
After all, if it is indeed about the economy, stupid, the only votes there for Democrats are mindless drones who don’t care that nary an economic indicator has improved since Barack Obama took office $5 trillion in new debt ago.
Those of us with eyes open and an IQ above that of our shoe size can’t help but notice. The spin of the last 3 ½ years has left people so dizzy distraction is all that’s left.
So what do we get from the Obama White House? That government should pay for everyone’s contraception – a non-issue that Democrats flat-out lied about and whose only “accomplishment” was to give MSNBC something to put in their chyron rotation alongside “war on the poor,” “war on the elderly” and “war on the middle class. That’s about it.
We also get Ted Nugent. The Motor City Madman said of the President and his fellow Democrats, “We need to ride into that battlefield and chop their heads off in November! Any questions?”
The outrage from Democrats and their fellow travelers in the media was quick and desperate. It’s a violent threat, and it’s Mitt Romney’s fault … because Terrible Ted endorsed him. They hadn’t cranked the high-dudgeon machine that high since they tried to deny the connection between President Obama and endorser Jimmy Hoffa Jr., after Hoffa, the Teamsters president, called on a crowd at a Labor Day rally to “take these son-of-a-bitches out.”
Only it’s somewhat more difficult to deny the connection when the president was at the rally and spoke after Hoffa and thus had every opportunity to discuss his friend’s “over the top” rhetoric – but didn’t. But you know how it is. If it weren’t for double standards, Democrats and the media would have no standards at all.
MSNBC spent the better part of two days highlighting Nugent’s remarks. The outrage and indignation applied to this non-story would lead one to believe Mitt Romney had launched his political career in the home of a domestic terrorist or something.
But again … we can’t expect much from a media that serves as a lapdog for the president and his extreme ideology.
And speaking of dogs…
Thirty years ago Mitt Romney took a family vacation and put his dog in a crate on top of the car. Anyone who has seen a dog in the back of a pick-up truck or sticking their head out a car window wouldn’t think much of this because a.) dogs like the wind, and b.) it’s a dog.
But the media reaction to this story would lead you to believe Romney pulled a “Clark Griswold” and chained the dog to the bumper, dragging it to its death. Or beat it mercilessly. Or worse, ate it.
I mention that last one because that’s what a young Barack Obama did to dogs during his time in Indonesia. Yes, we have a president who ate dogs.
Now, I don’t care Barack Obama ate dogs. Neither does he given he wrote openly about it in his book Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance. But the hypocrisy over the outrage of the Romney dog story necessitates looking into it.
The lapdog media immediately snapped to attention to protect their master. PolitiFact decided not to “fact check” it because it is, in fact, a fact. Instead, they oddly felt the need to put it “in context.” Not to be outdone, Buzzfeed, a new breed of lapdog bred from the bowels of former Politico “journalists” took their defense a step further. They posted a story about the practice of eating dog meat, along with graphic photos, and equated it to eating chicken. Yes, you read that right, eating chicken, complete with pictures of both President Obama and Mitt Romney eating chicken.
PETA, the radical left-wing animal rights group, wasn’t going to waste time trying to create a distraction, they simply gave Obama a pass on his culinary experiment.
Given the poverty from which many of our past presidents have risen, he may well not be the first to have eaten dogs. But that’s hardly the point.
But PETA has no such understanding for Mitt Romney. Its website features a post about the trip entitled, “Mitt Romney’s Cruel Vacation.”
Romney’s dog, delicious as it might have been, lived through the vacation and lived out the rest of his life naturally. And the entire episode would be a non-story if, again, the president and his people felt comfortable talking about the economy, unemployment, gas prices, the explosion of federal spending, etc.
David Axelrod, the head of President Obama’s reelection campaign, couldn’t let sleeping dogs lie. He tweeted a photo of the president in the car with his dog “Bo” with the caption, “How loving owners transport their dogs.”
It was then it hit why Democrats had become so outraged about how Romney treated his dog. It’s not the dog so much as that the Romneys were in their own car – not a government-issue sedan. And they were paying for the trip themselves – another concept big-government liberals can’t seem to master.
But you won’t hear any of this in the lapdog media. What you will hear is more nitpicking of non-issues as they pertain to Mitt Romney. You’ll hear more about the Mormon Church, into which Romney was born, than you ever heard about the radical racist Rev. Jeremiah Wright, into whose church an adult Barack Obama willingly walked and stayed for 20 years. You’ll hear more “truth” about Mitt Romney’s record than you’ll hear about the millions of Americans who don’t count in Barack Obama’s unemployment numbers because they’ve given up looking for work. You’ll hear more about how rich Mitt Romney made himself legally than you even will about how rich Barack Obama made his big donors with our money.
The lapdog media never will cover this president honestly. They will spin for him and obstruct his failed record as long as they can because they support his left-wing agenda and they think, based on their occupations, that they know what is best for America. Well, that and they know how he has the potential to treats dogs.
PS:
Many of you have sent me emails (Thank you for them. I read them all and respond to as many as time will allow) saying you miss the long-form columns I used to write that had quick hits at the end. Life doesn’t allow for me to do that every week. This weekend, for instance, I’m best man at a wedding, so my entire week is compressed. But here are two quick ones.
Government at Work…sort of. Nancy Pelosi says unemployment checks are one of the best ways to stimulate the economy. Were that true, given the real unemployment rate, we’d be a lot closer to economic recovery than we are to Greece. Unemployment checks don’t stimulate the economy, of course. In fact, they seem to prevent unemployment from coming down as quickly as it otherwise would. But it does seem some concerned employees of the government of the District of Columbia took Pelosi’s words the heart and decided to collect unemployment while being employed. They’ve since been caught and are facing charges. If I could, I’d like to suggest the following defense for these people: Most government employees don’t really work, so technically they’re qualified for unemployment. Then again, it looks as though the Obama administration might’ve liked what it has seen in its own backyard.
What’s a Pension? You don’t have to feel sorry for Terry List, a public school teacher in Michigan. She wants you to, but it’s highly unnecessary. She is upset because she had her life all planned out, and the state is trying to stop her. She wanted to retire at age 47. She hadn’t earned or saved enough to do it, but she had planned to take advantage of extremely union-friendly laws that would have allowed her to become a parasite of the state at an early age. The Michigan legislature has moved to deny this. It will make her wait till age 60 to collect retiree health benefits and, horror of horrors, also require her to contribute at least 5 percent to her retirement plan. The private sector has seen pensions (guaranteed income for life) replaced by 401k’s (where workers, with contributions from their employers, are responsible for themselves). But a lot of public-sector workers, such as Ms. List, want taxpayers to subsidize their lives of leisure through some of their most productive years. She is outraged. She told her union, the Michigan Education Association, that “Right now, I would not recommend to my pupils to become a teacher in Michigan.” I support this. I don’t want anyone who learned from a lazy, parasite wanna-be such as Terry List to enter the teaching profession. We have enough worthless teachers we can’t get rid of now, and it looks like we’ll be stuck with her till she’s 60. She could quit, of course. But that would benefit her students and the state – and those are things she has no interest in doing.
A Picture is Worth 1,000 Words, a Handshake… Desperate to raise enough campaign cash to run enough attack ads to keep the focus off his dismal record, our president charged supporters $1,000 for a handshake in Dearborn, Mich., this week. One of the cultists who lined up to touch the “Dear Leader” told a reporter, “You know, you go without a couple of meals. We can miss a couple meals.” Hopefully, this was not literal. Hopefully, people are not missing meals for five seconds of physical contact with a man who “will not reset” until he gets the economy back on track…or how it will affect his putting and chipping as he continues his record amount of golfing for a president.
That is all, go about your week.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Tagged with:
 

PALMDALE, CA – Seven black teens have been arrested on suspicion that they committed a hate crime when they attacked a 15-year-old Hispanic boy while he was walking home from school in Southern California, according to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Office.
The March 14 beating was captured on video and posted on YouTube, but has since been removed from the site.
The seven boys, ages 13 to 16, were arrested Wednesday for investigation of assault and committing a hate crime.
The video shows as many as 10 boys surrounding the victim and challenging him to a fight. The suspects then began hitting the teen while others watched.
During the beating, the teens made racially derogatory statements that were captured on the video, Ford said.
After the victim fell to the ground, the assailants kicked him multiple times in the head, knocked out several teeth and left shoe impressions on his skin, Ford said.
The victim was able to get to his feet and escape the onslaught, and will need to undergo dental surgery.
The teens who were arrested were identified from the video, which was discovered by a Palmdale sheriff’s deputy and has been retained for evidence. Authorities are not releasing the video.
No comment yet from the White House or Justice Department.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Tagged with:
 

Illegals and Obama

On March 10, 2012, in Barrack Obama, by admin

Illegals and Obama

If you can watch this and not be outraged, it means
we probably have already lost this battle. This issue
alone should defeat Obama in November.

Watch, and let this sink in !
The person in this video is a professor (Ph..D.) at Yavapai College in Prescott , Arizona . He puts a different spin on what
Obama is doing to Arizona. This must be why he’s rated
highly by his students – 3.8 on a 4.0 scale. This may
be the best video produced on the illegal alien
problems that are being experienced. Watch the video,
it is short and makes a lot of sense. Forward the
email to at least ten people you know. We need to get
the word out.

WATCH AND FORWARD!!!!!!

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Tagged with:
 

PHOENIX – An investigative “Cold Case Posse” launched six months ago by “America’s toughest sheriff” – Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County – has concluded there is probable cause that the document released by the White House last year as President Obama’s birth certificate is a computer-generated forgery.

Obama did not provide an ID

The investigative team has asked Arpaio, who is at a news conference in Phoenix live-streamed by WND TV that began at 3 p.m. Eastern time, to elevate the investigation to a criminal probe that will make available the resources of his Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.

The posse says it has identified at least one person of interest in the alleged forgery of Obama’s birth certificate.

Arapaio, known for his strict enforcement of immigration laws, commissioned the investigative team after local citizens presented him with a petition expressing concern that Obama might not be eligible for Arizona’s presidential ballot.

In addition to the live-streaming, WND is making available to the public a report distributed to media today by Arpaio’s investigators.

GET A FREE COPY OF THE ARPAIO REPORT THAT WAS DISTRIBUTED TO PRESS TODAY

The posse, comprised of former law enforcement officers and lawyers with law enforcement experience, has interviewed dozens of witnesses and examined hundreds of documents. It also has taken numerous sworn statements from witnesses around the world.

Mike Zullo, Arpaio’s lead investigator, said his team believes the Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in a systematic effort to hide from public inspection any original 1961 birth records it may have in its possession.

“Officers of the Hawaii Department of Health and various elected Hawaiian public officials may have intentionally obscured 1961 birth records and procedures to avoid having to release to public inspection and to the examination of court-authorized forensic examiners any original Obama 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may or may not have,” Zullo said.

The investigators say the evidence contained in the computer-generated PDF file released by the White House as well as important deficiencies in the Hawaii process of certifying the long-form birth certificate establish probable cause that a forgery has been committed.

The investigation was launched after 250 members of the Surprise, Ariz., Tea Party, presented a signed petition to Arpaio in August 2011 asking him to undertake the investigation.

The Tea Party members petitioned under the premise that if a forged birth certificate was used to place Barack Obama on the 2012 Arizona presidential ballot, their rights as Maricopa County voters could be compromised.

Arpaio believes a congressional investigation might be warranted and has asked that any information relevant to the investigation held by other law enforcement agencies be forwarded to his office.

The Cold Case Posse advised Arpaio that they believe forgers committed two crimes. First, they say it appears the White House fraudulently created a forgery that it characterized as an officially produced governmental birth record. Second, the White House fraudulently presented to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery represented as “proof positive” of President Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate.

via Sheriff Joe: ‘Probable cause’ Obama certificate a fraud.

Technorati Tags: Altered, Arizona, Arpaio, barackobama, Birth Certificate, fake, fraud, Hawaii, Hawaii Department of Health, Joe Arpaio, Maricopa County Arizona, Obama, selective service card, Sheriff Joe Arpaio, White House

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Tagged with: